HPLC LC/MS Troubleshooting

Chromatography troubleshooting is a key part of a chromatographer’s daily work. Here, we present articles and protocols to help a chromatorgher achieve this efficiently.

Icon panel of three HPLC selectivity levers: mobile-phase pH with schematic retention curves for an acid and a base, the organic modifier as methanol, acetonitrile and THF on the solvent selectivity triangle, and the stationary phase as a column replacement. A strip below shows temperature, screened with gradient time in step 3.

How to Optimize HPLC Selectivity: A Systematic pH, Solvent and Temperature Screen

To optimize HPLC selectivity, work through the levers in order and track the critical pair: scout mobile-phase pH against the analytes’ pKa with a buffer matched to each pH, compare acetonitrile, methanol and tetrahydrofuran at similar retention, screen temperature with gradient time, then confirm the chosen conditions in a robustness check.1,2,3 How do you optimize …

How to Optimize HPLC Selectivity: A Systematic pH, Solvent and Temperature Screen Read More »

Schematic of an HPLC flow path for extra-column dispersion: pump and injector, inlet tubing, column, outlet tubing and UV detector on a copper flow line, with labels for injector, tubing, fittings, flow cell and time constant.

Extra-Column Dispersion: Where Efficiency Is Lost Outside the Column

Extra-column dispersion is the peak broadening that the injector, connecting tubing, fittings and detector add outside the column; their variances, not their widths, add to the column variance.1,2 Small, early-eluting peaks from short, narrow, small-particle columns lose the most efficiency.3,2 Measure it with a zero-dead-volume union, then change contributors one at a time.1,4 What is …

Extra-Column Dispersion: Where Efficiency Is Lost Outside the Column Read More »

Icon chain of sample vial, injector and column head showing a strong sample diluent plug carrying the analyte band into the column and smearing it, contrasted with a weaker diluent plug that concentrates the band at the column inlet.

Injection Solvent Effects: How Diluent Strength and Injection Volume Distort Peaks

A sample diluent stronger than the mobile phase carries the analyte band through the column inlet inside the injected plug until that plug is diluted, so peaks front, broaden or split, early eluters worst.1,2 The damage scales with injection volume and strength mismatch together; diluting the strong solvent or injecting less improves peak shape.3,4 What …

Injection Solvent Effects: How Diluent Strength and Injection Volume Distort Peaks Read More »

Map of the route from a USP monograph to a replacement column. Band A, five tiles joined by arrows: 1, Monograph (a page with an L1 chip): names the L-code, typical dimensions and system suitability criteria; no brand. 2, USP column database (a listing with one row highlighted): lists the column used in validation, brands and alternatives; a listing is not an endorsement. 3, Same substituent (C18 labelled L1 with a tick, C8 labelled L7 with a cross): no change of substituent identity; a C18 stays L1; a C8 (L7) is a modification. 4, Rank by Fs (schematic bars with an Fs = 3 line): USP–PQRI comparison at pH 2.8 or 7.0; Fs ≤ 3 suggests equivalence. 5, USP ⟨621⟩ and system suitability (an L/dp change bar from −25% to +50% above an original and a replacement trace with the same peaks): L/dp within −25% to +50%; pass system suitability on the real sample. Band B, What an L-code leaves open: support, surface modification, extent of modification must be similar to the original under USP ⟨621⟩; brand not named in the monograph; selectivity not described by any L-code.

Choosing an HPLC Column for a Regulated Method: USP L-Designations, Equivalency and Revalidation

A USP L-designation names a packing type, not a column: many dissimilar C18 columns are all L1. To replace the column in a USP monograph method, keep the same bonded substituent, rank candidates by their USP–PQRI similarity value F (≤ 3 suggests equivalence), stay within the ⟨621⟩ adjustments and pass system suitability. Other changes need …

Choosing an HPLC Column for a Regulated Method: USP L-Designations, Equivalency and Revalidation Read More »

Two HPLC column tiles for method scaling, 150 × 4.6 mm 5 µm and 100 × 2.1 mm 2.7 µm, with chips for L/dp, flow rate, gradient time, injection volume, column volume ratio and estimated pressure.

HPLC Column Dimensions and Particle Size: How to Scale a Method Correctly

To scale an HPLC method to a new column, keep column chemistry unchanged, hold the length-to-particle-size ratio (L/dp) within −25% to +50%, scale flow rate with the square of internal diameter (under ⟨621⟩, also particle size) and scale injection volume and gradient time with column volume so the gradient volume, in column volumes, stays constant.1,2,3,4 …

HPLC Column Dimensions and Particle Size: How to Scale a Method Correctly Read More »

Two particle tiles comparing reversed-phase and HILIC retention: a hydrophobic ligand retaining nonpolar analytes longest and a water-rich layer retaining polar analytes longest, with retention-order chips beneath each tile.

When Should You Switch from Reversed-Phase HPLC to HILIC?

Use HILIC instead of reversed phase when polar or ionized analytes stay weakly retained after pH adjustment and aqueous-stable reversed-phase columns have been tried, and when sample solubility, diluent, detection and method intent allow a mode change.1,2 Very low k is a warning sign, not a universal switch threshold. Why does reversed-phase retention collapse for …

When Should You Switch from Reversed-Phase HPLC to HILIC? Read More »

Map of second-phase choices for an alkylsilica primary column. Top band: five columns for alkylsilica (C8, C18, the primary), phenyl, cyano, PFP and EPG, each with a silica particle and a schematic ligand (alkyl chain, phenyl ring, nitrile, pentafluorophenyl ring, alkyl chain with an embedded polar group), the interactions it adds beyond alkylsilica, a bar for its average error in predicted k (±1%, 7%, 10%, ±15%, ±20%) and how to use it; PFP is marked first choice orthogonal to alkylsilica. Bottom band: the five model parameters H, S*, A, B and C with the Fs guidelines (35 or more ignoring C for nonionized samples, 100 or more with ionized solutes), methanol and acetonitrile bottles for the organic-modifier lever, and a pH ruler with a bracket marking about 1 to 1.5 units from the pKa.

How to Choose an Orthogonal HPLC Column for Impurity Profiling

Choose an orthogonal HPLC column for impurity profiling by its selectivity, not its label. Pick a phase whose interactions differ from the primary column, change pH or organic modifier where the impurities allow, and test both methods on the same stressed and spiked samples. A useful orthogonal method finds peaks the primary method hides.1,2 What …

How to Choose an Orthogonal HPLC Column for Impurity Profiling Read More »

Three silica particles with green bonded chains. Type A shows filled red acidic silanols and amber metal impurities; Type B shows red-ring, less acidic silanols and no metal marks (very low metal content); endcapped Type B shows some sites capped by grey silyl groups and the rest as red rings, with no metal marks. Each lists metals, silanols and the effect on basic analytes. Below, four sequential steps for moving a legacy Type A method to a modern column.

Type A vs Type B Silica and Endcapping: Why Basic Analytes Tail Differently

Basic analytes can tail differently on nominally similar HPLC columns because their silica surfaces expose different secondary interaction sites. Older Type A silica carries metal impurities that make residual silanols more acidic than on high-purity Type B silica. Endcapping reduces accessible silanols but does not remove them. Compare a neutral marker, mobile-phase pH and column …

Type A vs Type B Silica and Endcapping: Why Basic Analytes Tail Differently Read More »

Five columns for C18, C8, phenyl, PFP and HILIC. Top: a silica particle with a schematic ligand (long alkyl chain, short alkyl chain, phenyl ring on a spacer, pentafluorophenyl ring on a spacer, polar OH group with water) and when to screen that phase. Bottom: a matrix of six interactions (hydrophobic, π–π, dipolar, ionic, steric, water-layer partitioning) with filled dots for principal and rings for contributing interactions.

C18 vs C8 vs Phenyl vs PFP vs HILIC: How Stationary-Phase Chemistry Changes Selectivity

C18 and C8 primarily retain analytes through hydrophobic interactions, while phenyl and pentafluorophenyl (PFP) phases can alter selectivity through aromatic, dipolar and other interactions. HILIC instead favors retention of many polar solutes under high-organic conditions. Choose the phase by the critical analyte pair, not by a stationary-phase label alone. How does stationary-phase chemistry change HPLC …

C18 vs C8 vs Phenyl vs PFP vs HILIC: How Stationary-Phase Chemistry Changes Selectivity Read More »

Three panels show fresh blanks before and after a high sample, independent injection-cycle, column and tubing/divert-valve comparisons, then a clean source-feed check and repeat challenge after correction.

LC-MS/MS Carryover Localization: Autosampler, Column, Tubing or Source?

To localize LC-MS/MS carryover, first establish whether a clean blank acquires analyte-associated response after a high sample. Then compare an injected blank with a true no-injection run, test column involvement and isolate fluidic sections one at a time. A blank peak alone does not identify the contaminated component. Mobile-phase contamination, vial contamination, interference and late …

LC-MS/MS Carryover Localization: Autosampler, Column, Tubing or Source? Read More »

Scroll to Top